Eternal Life, capter 21
Thursday, November 26th, 2020To: In residence Churches of God. God’s, 9th month, Kisiev 6, 5,981. 11/25/20 People in denominational comfort zones don’t generally attempt to prove all things as Jesus commanded through His apostles. Attending a congregational meeting and supporting it fulfills the comfort need of the unbeliever.
Last study we promised the following, first we ask that folks skip the next five paragraphs unless they had a scholarly propensity.
The proponents of this addition are primarily Catholics, who wanted to sell their trinity doctrine. This is an error Martin Luther did not find. FOR YOU who want scholarly evidence, the following is from the Net Bible translators.
This reading, the infamous Comma Johanneum, (known as the trinity doctrine) has been known in the English-speaking world through the King James translation. However, the evidence – both external and internal – is decidedly against its authenticity. For a detailed discussion, see TCGNT 647-49. Our discussion will briefly address the external evidence. This longer reading is found only in nine late manuscripts; four of which have the words in a marginal note. Most of these manuscripts (221 2318 [18th century] {2473 [dated 1634]} and [with minor variations] 61 88 429 629 636 918) originate from the 16th century; the earliest manuscripts, codex 221 (10th century) includes the reading in a marginal note, added sometime after the original composition. The oldest manuscripts with the Comma in its text is from the 14th century (629), but the wording here departs from all the other manuscripts in several places. The next oldest manuscripts on behalf of the Comma, 88 (12th century) 429 (14th) 636 (15th), also have the reading only as a marginal note (v.l.). The remaining manuscripts are from the 16th to 18th centuries. Thus, there is NO sure evidence of this reading in any Greek manuscript until the 14th century (629), and that manuscript deviates from all others in its wording; the wording that matches what is found in the translation was apparently composed after Erasmus’ Greek New Testament was published in 1516. Indeed, the Comma appears in no Greek witness of any kind (either manuscript, patristic, or Greek translation of some other version) until A.D. 1215 (in a Greek translation of the Acts of the Lateran Council, a work originally written in Latin). This is all the more significant since many a Greek Fathers would have loved such a reading, for it so succinctly affirms the doctrine of the Trinity. The reading seems to have arisen in a 4th century Latin homily in which the text was allegorized to refer to members of the Trinity. From there, it made its way into copies of the Latin Vulgate, the text used by the Roman Catholic Church.
The Trinitarian formula (known as the Comma Johanneum) made its way into the third edition of Erasmus’ Greek New Testament (1522) because of pressure from the Catholic Church. After his first edition appeared, there arose such a furor over the absence of the Comma that Erasmus needed to defend himself. He argued that he did not put in the Comma because he found no Greek manuscript that included it. Once one was produced (codex 61, written in ca. 1520), Erasmus apparently felt obliged to include the reading. He became aware of this manuscript sometime between May of 1520 and September of 1521. In his annotations to his third edition he does not protest the rendering now in his text, as though it were made to order; but he does defend himself from the charge of indolence, noting that he had taken care to find whatever manuscripts he could for the production of his text. In the final analysis, Erasmus probably altered the text because of politico-theologico-economic concerns: He did not want his reputation ruined, nor his Novum Instrumentum to go unsold. Modern advocates of the Trinity and King James Version generally argue for the inclusion of the Comma Johanneum “trinity doctrine) on the basis of heretical motivation by scribes who did not include it. But these same scribes elsewhere include thoroughly orthodox readings – even in places where the Trinity /Byzantine manuscripts lack them. Further, these advocates argue theologically from the position of divine preservation: Since this verse is in the Trinity, it must be original. (Of course, this approach is circular, presupposing as it does that the Trinity is in the original text.)
In reality, the issue is history, not heresy: How can one argue that the Comma Johanneum goes back to the original text yet does not appear until the 14th century in any Greek manuscript (and that form is significantly different from what is printed in the Trinity; the wording of the Trinity is not found in any Greek manuscript until the 16th century)? Such a stance does not do justice to the gospel:
Faith must be rooted in history. Significantly, the German translation of Luther was based on Erasmus’ second edition (1519) and lacked the Comma. “trinity doctrine” But the King James Version translators, basing their work principally on Theodore Beza’s 10th edition of the Greek New Testament (1598), a work which itself was fundamentally based on Erasmus’ third and later editions (and Stephanus’ editions), popularized the Comma “trinity doctrine” for the English-speaking world. Thus, the Comma Johanneum has been a battleground for English-speaking Christians more than for others.
Satan is the Author of confusion: John, Peter and Jude testify that “false prophets brought in confusion with their teaching.” The holy spirit sent from God to dwell in people is the spirit of truth that dwells in Believers IN. (If an individual deity; multiplies it’s self many thousands of times in people were the case, “individual people would cease to be as individuals.)
Why did Catholics want to sell this trinity lie? It fits their supposition that Peter was the first pope and power transferring from pope to pope. So they attempt to sell the world on the idea that they have power to put people in the church, make people saints and the like. All of which are contrary to Jesus’ and His apostles teaching. REMEMBER, if one lie is incorporated into one’s belief system; more lies must be believed to support the first. Let’s pray for God’s revelations to our minds.
(1 John 5:9-12; “If we accept the testimony of men, the testimony of God is greater, because this is the testimony of God that He has testified concerning His Son. (10) (The one who believes IN the Son of God has the testimony in himself; the one who does not believe God has made Him a liar, because he has not believed IN the testimony that God has testified concerning His Son.) (11) And this is the testimony: God has given US “we Believers IN” eternal life, and this life is IN His Son. (12) The one who has the Son has THIS eternal life; the one who does not have the Son of God does not have this eternal life.”) Truth is all about believing IN Jesus as He manifest Himself to be in His ORIGINAL holy inspired scriptures.
When scripture is allowed to complement scripture we don’t need this so called intellectual stuff, I haven’t studied the deep on this subject because I haven’t been spiritually led to do so.